Issue StoriesIndepth
Legislation Threatens Medical Spasby Rima Bedevian Although these services offered at medical spas are considered medical, they are often performed without the direct supervision of a physician. As the medical-spa industry continues to grow, state lawmakers are taking a closer look at it. California State Sen Liz Figueroa (D–Fremont) has introduced Senate Bill 1423, which, if passed, will require physicians to be present during all laser and aesthetic medical procedures. A related bill, also introduced by Figueroa, would make it a misdemeanor for anyone but a physician, nurse, or physician assistant (PA) to use laser devices. Figueroa says a lack of regulation in California’s medical-spa industry has helped spur the rapid expansion of the industry, but has also raised serious safety concerns. “Right now, there are no standards for any individual performing laser treatments,” says Figueroa, who has had constituents come to her with burns and scars they say are from improper use of laser equipment at medical spas. “I just want to make sure the consumers are safe. I don’t want to hinder anyone’s business.” Currently, medical law in California: • provides for the licensing and regulation of physicians and surgeons by the Medical Board of California (MBC); Michelle Ehrlich, MD, a plastic surgeon and dermatologist who practices in Rolling Hills Estates, Calif, says the dangers of unsupervised medical procedures outweigh the benefits. “Lasers are surgical devices that, when used correctly, have the potential to provide safe and effective medical and cosmetic improvement,” Ehrlich says. “If used incorrectly by an inexperienced operator, or by an operator who does not have the appropriate medical background to manage complications immediately, these same surgical devices can cause serious injury, including burns, scarring, and blindness.” If passed, the Senate Bill will require a physician who delegates the performance or administration of any elective aesthetic medical procedure, or treatment using lasers or intense pulsed-light devices, to a licensed health care provider (LHCP) to: • personally observe all elective aesthetic procedures delegated to an LHCP until assured of the LHCP’s competency; On the basis of a survey of its members, the Association of Medical Esthetic Nurses (AMEN) has taken the position that the bill is antinurse and establishes a precedent for further restrictions on settings where nurses practice with a significant degree of independence. AMEN recognizes that untrained and unqualified providers of aesthetic services can pose a risk to the public. However, it does not believe that “on-site” supervision of all nurses by a physician is necessary, cost-efficient for consumers, or even the best way to ensure patient safety. According to Sasha Parker, RN, president of AMEN, the notion of nurses practicing pursuant to protocols and standardized procedures is nothing new. “In hospitals, home care situations, clinics, and other practice settings, nurses are involved with patients who are less healthy, who have more complex problems, pose higher risk factors, and require more invasive responses should certain incidents arise,” Parker says. “Yet there is no call to alter those practice settings with an ‘on-site’ supervision requirement.” The two houses of the Florida Legislature have passed similar bills that restrict the ability of nurse practitioners and physician assistants to perform aesthetic treatments using laser and intense pulsed-light systems, but Gov Jeb Bush has not signed either because opposition to these measures has developed. Other states considering the passage of similar bills are Georgia, North Carolina, and Texas. |
|
|
Featured Jobs
Find a Job |
ADDITIONAL ONLINE RESOURCES |
Featured Employer
|